LC-MS/MS vs HPLC for peptide analysis — November 2025 — Page 10 — COA & Analytical Testing

WendyG_ATL

Member

1,023

5,678

Apr 2024

Georgia

Jul 23, 2024 at 5:47 AM#46

Following this thread closely. LC-MS/MS vs HPLC for is something I'm actively working through.

Last edited: Jul 23, 2024 at 6:47 AM

21 13Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara and 18 others

Reply Quote Save Share Report

SurmountFan_IN

Member

789

3,456

May 2024

Indianapolis, IN

Jul 23, 2024 at 6:04 AM#47

Just wanted to say — for anyone reading this LC-MS/MS vs HPLC for thread who is feeling discouraged: it gets better. The first few weeks are the hardest. Hang in there. 💪

Last edited: Jul 23, 2024 at 7:04 AM

19 14AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 16 others

Reply Quote Save Share Report

hans_munich

Member

534

2,345

Jul 2024

Munich, DE

Jul 23, 2024 at 6:21 AM#48

Subscribing to this thread. LC-MS/MS vs HPLC for is exactly what I've been researching. 🙏

40 21Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa and 37 others

Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results

Dr.GastroMayo

VIP Member

2,345

13,456

Jan 2024

Mayo Clinic, MN

Jul 23, 2024 at 6:38 AM#49

+1 to mia_MS2. Especially the point about "Follow-up question: did you change anyth..." — I have seen the same in my own experience with LC-MS/MS vs HPLC for.

Last edited: Jul 23, 2024 at 11:38 AM

32 21MikeFit_NJ, InsuranceTom, WendyG_ATL and 29 others

Reply Quote Save Share Report